![]() In its report in March, FiveThirtyEight said the duplicate puzzles were revealed through a database created by Saul Pwanson, a software engineer from Seattle. “We conducted our own investigation and we are satisfied with how Universal Uclick has responded to the situation.” “USA Today continues to take this matter very seriously,” the statement said. Patrick Soon-Shiong News Executive Editor: Kevin Merida Opinion Editor of the Editorial Page: Terry Tang Business Executive Team. Parker was never an employee of USA Today and that no future puzzles in Gannett publications would be edited by him. In a statement on Tuesday, Gannett said that Mr. PRINT PUBLICATIONS- The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal DIGITAL PUBLICATIONS- The Atlantic, Fireball Crosswords, The Puzzle. Since 1999, Norris has been editor of the Los Angeles Times crossword, syndicated by Tribune Media Services, Inc. Search for crossword clues found in the NY Times, Daily Celebrity, Daily Mirror. Rich Norris is one of the most prolific authors of the New York Times crosswords in the last 15 years. Parker on Tuesday night were unsuccessful. Answers for LONGTIME LOS ANGELES TIMES CRITIC RICHARD crossword clue. Parker would take a three-month leave of absence as editor of the Universal Crossword puzzle.Įfforts to reach Mr. In the statement, Universal Uclick said it began an internal investigation after the reports of plagiarism appeared and its findings “confirmed some of the allegations.” The company said Mr. Parker would not return as editor of the USA Today crossword puzzle and his work would not appear in Gannett or USA Today Network publications. For the visualizations, we originally imagined the boxes for 7-Down being stretched into rectangles, but the editing team felt this was unnecessary in the end.The company said then that Mr. ![]() And we did it twice! We both believed in the idea, and I'm glad we took a punt to rework and resubmit. While it was helpful that we could move things around without worrying about symmetry, the loss of that constraint meant that there was a lot of grid trial-and-error. It was a long and arduous path, and I learned a lot about constructing technique in the process. I enjoy solving this style of puzzle, so I'm glad Christina wanted to work with me on this. It reminded me of my elementary school teacher who used to hand out these types of brainteasers every morning, and I remember feeling oh so clever when I figured them out. KATIE: When Christina approached me with this idea, I had never made, or even thought about making, a rebus puzzle with this kind of visual representation for answers. Katie was a joy to work with, though, as always! ![]() I'm so glad they liked the changes enough to bite the second time around because this version was even harder to construct. The feedback they gave in their rejection (which was decidedly a "no," and not a request for revisions) made me think maybe, just maybe, if we redid the puzzle with a few different entries, they'd go for it. Our first submission had just "LEGS" stretched instead of ONE'S LEGS, and a couple of other entries the editing team didn't like. Then, I can not believe how hard it was to fill a grid with entries that don't contain any body parts! Every time we had a grid that we liked, one of us would go, "Oh noooo, how did STINKEYE get in there?!" (etc., etc.,) Since the entries are not symmetrically placed, it was really difficult to build the grid around them. While this is one of my favorite ideas for a puzzle, the technical aspects made it an absolute nightmare to create. Sometime in 2020, Katie and I were working on a different puzzle about body parts, and I suddenly realized a lot of the phrases we were playing with had elements that would work well with a rebus, which led to this puzzle. Besides just being a generally terrible puzzle, the theme entries had nothing tying them together. My very first submission to the NYT was a puzzle using rebuses in this style.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |